Honestly? Most study advice is bullshit
Never let your studying go to waste
No feedback: half the effect (0.39 vs 0.73) Explaining it yourself: g 0.55 · 69 studies Recall vs rereading: 39% vs 26% at 6 months Spacing in med ed: SMD 0.78 · 21,415 learners
Stop trying a million study systems
Use one that's backed by evidence, built by someone who actually does it
Don't listen to study advice from people who have never done it
Principle · same-source coherence
The interesting claim is not that there are four things. It is that they cannot contradict each other, because they are four questions asked of one lecture. Every competitor ships a pile of separate artefacts that drift apart the moment one is edited. Name the consequence of the architecture, not the feature count.
Ban: "all-in-one", "everything you need", any phrasing that makes this sound like a bundle. A bundle is exactly what it isn't.
Research that doesn't work in practice. Anecdotes you can't repeat. This is the best of both worlds
Encode
First, encode it. Simplify, compare, connect, then say it out loud
Recall
Then recall it, so what you understood survives the pressure. Then do that... a lot
SBA
Then practise it, so the confidence is still there on exam day
Disease index
Then a quick review of the highest-yield material, so you can recall it in bulk
The honest part
Why NOT to sign up
Principle · de-selection buys more than any promise
Telling a distrustful buyer not to buy is the highest-trust move available, and it costs nothing, because the people it repels were never going to convert. In a school cohort it also protects the channel: a bad fit who churns talks, and the talking is your distribution.
This is the one page section a competitor cannot copy without lying less than they currently do.
Ban: apology, "we're working on it", roadmap language. A limit stated flatly reads as confidence. A limit stated with a promise attached reads as a sales objection being handled.
- Not a med student? No.
- Don't want to change your old ways? No.
- Think this means you won't study for hours?It cuts the wasted effort, not the hours. No.
- Want a free tool you'll never use? No.
- Want a paid tool you'll never use? No.
- Want to be a bad doctor? No.
- In the demo
- The notes page, flashcards, SBA questions and a disease index, on one sample lecture
- Upcoming Enterprise Features
- Custom Lecture Uploads · Multi-Account Workspaces · Voice-to-Text Clinical Recording · Direct Anki Sync Integration · OSCE Grading Checklists
Request Private Beta Access
Principle · repel the wrong prospect
The last thing before the field should narrow the audience, not widen it. "If your exams are pure recall and you're scoring fine, don't change anything" earns more trust than any promise, and it filters out the churn that would otherwise talk.
Ban, all of it: countdowns, "limited spots", "closing soon", founder-cohort urgency, "join 500 students". This buyer is sceptical because of those exact moves — they are the most-used play in the study-app category he has been marketed at since sixth form. They do not read as pressure, they read as category identification, and then he's gone.
Honest scarcity may exist in the offer. It may not appear here. In three seconds of scroll nobody can tell real capacity from theatre.
Access is invitation-only. We’ll invite medical cohorts in stages as the beta opens.
We’ll email you the demo, launch news and the occasional offer. Unsubscribe any time. Privacy Policy · Terms